Would a statutory body, corporation or an authority constituted under an Act passed by the Parliament or any of the State Legislatures be regarded as ‘Government’ or “local authority” for the purposes of the GST Acts?

A statutory body, corporation or an authority created by the Parliament or a State Legislature is neither ‘Government’ nor a ‘local authority’. Such statutory bodies, corporations or authorities are normally created by the Parliament or a State Legislature in exercise of the powers conferred under article 53(3)(b) and article 154(2)(b) of the Constitution respectively. It is a settled position of law (Agarwal Vs. Hindustan Steel AIR 1970 Supreme Court 1150) that the manpower of such statutory authorities or bodies do not become officers subordinate to the President under article 53(1) of the Constitution and similarly to the Governor under article 154(1). Such a statutory body,
corporation or an authority as a juridical entity is separate from the State and cannot be regarded as the Central or a State Government and also do not fall in the definition of ‘local authority’. Thus, regulatory bodies and other autonomous entities would not be regarded as the government or local authorities for the purposes of the GST Acts.

(FAQ 6: GOVERNMENT SERVICES)

Are all local bodies constituted by a State or Central Law regarded as local authorities for the purposes of the GST Acts

No. The definition of ‘local authority’ is very specific and means only those bodies which are mentioned as ‘local authorities’ in clause (69) of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017. It would not include other bodies which are merely described as a ‘local body’ by virtue of a local law. For example, State Governments have setup local developmental authorities to undertake developmental works like infrastructure, housing, residential & commercial
development, construction of houses, etc. The Governments setup these authorities under the Town and Planning Act. Examples of such developmental authorities are Delhi Development Authority, Ahmedabad Development Authority, Bangalore Development Authority, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Bihar Industrial Area
Development Authority, etc. Such developmental authorities formed under the Town and Planning Act are not qualified as local authorities for the purposes of the GST Acts.

(FAQ 5: GOVERNMENT SERVICES)

Who is a local authority

Local authority is defined in clause (69) of section 2 of the CGST Act, 2017 and means the following:
• a “Panchayat” as defined in clause (d) of article 243 of the Constitution;
• a “Municipality” as defined in clause (e) of article 243P of the Constitution;
• a Municipal Committee, a Zilla Parishad, a District Board, and any other authority legally entitled to, or entrusted by the Central Government or any State Government with the control or management of a municipal or local fund;
• a Cantonment Board as defined in section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 2006;
• a Regional Council or a District Council constituted under the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution;
• a Development Board constituted under article 371 of the Constitution; or
• a Regional Council constituted under article 371A of the Constitution;

(FAQ 4: GOVERNMENT INSTITUITIONS UNDER GST)

Whether a Government Department, required to deduct tax at source, is liable to take registration as a normal taxpayer

The Government Department is required to take registration as a normal taxpayer only if it makes a taxable supply of goods and/or services and in such cases, the registration shall be obtained on the basis of PAN but Bank account is not mandatory. However, if it is not making any taxable supply of goods and/or services, it is required to register only as a deductor of tax at source on the basis of TAN/PAN.
Note: Reference to CGST Act, 2017 includes reference to SGST Act, 2017 and UTGST Act, 2017 also.

Whether an amount in the form of royalty or any other form paid/payable to the Government for assigning the rights to use of natural resources is taxable?

The Government provides license to various
companies including Public Sector Undertakings for
exploration of natural resources like oil, hydrocarbons, iron
ore, manganese, etc. For having assigned the rights to use
the natural resources, the licensee companies are required
to pay consideration in the form of annual license fee, lease
charges, royalty, etc to the Government. The activity of
assignment of rights to use natural resources is treated as
supply of services and the licensee is required to pay tax on
the amount of consideration paid in the form of royalty or
any other form under reverse charge mechanism.

What is the concept called ‘tax deduction at source’?

As per section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017, the Government may mandate

(a) a department or establishment of the Central Government or State Government; or

(b) local authority; or

(c) Governmental agencies; or

(d) such persons or category of persons as may be notified by the Government
on the recommendations of the Council,

to deduct tax at the rate of one per cent on account of CGST and one percent on account of SGST from the payment made or credited to the supplier where the total value of the supply under a contract exceeds two lakh and fifty thousand rupees (excluding tax payable under the GST Acts). The deductor shall remit the deducted amount to the Government and is also required to furnish a certificate to the deductee by mentioning the details of the amount deducted and payment of such deducted amount.

Illustration: ABC Ltd supplies the service valued at Rs.3,00,000/- excluding tax to Government department. The department while making the payment of Rs. 3,00,000/-should deduct Rs. 3000/- on account of CGST and Rs. 3000/ on account of SGST and make a net payment of Rs. 2,94, 000/- to ABC Ltd. Thereafter, the department shall pay the amount of Rs. 3,000/- to the Central Government and Rs. 3,000/- to the State Government and furnish a certificate to the deductee, containing the details of such deduction including the details
of such deductee.

Would services in relation to supply of motor vehicles to Government be taxable?

  1. Supply of a motor vehicle meant to carry more than twelve passengers by way of giving on hire to a state transport undertaking is exempted from tax.
  2. The exemption is applicable to services provided to state transport undertaking and not to other departments of Government or local authority. Generally, such State transport undertakings/corporations are established by law with a view to providing public transport facility to the commuters.
  3. In some cases, transport undertakings hire the buses on lease basis from private persons on payment of consideration.
  4. The services by way of supply of motor vehicles to such state transport undertaking are exempt from payment of tax. However, supplies of motor vehicles to Government Departments other than the state transport undertakings are taxable.

What is the scope of ‘pure services’ mentioned in the exemption notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017?

In the context of the language used in the notification, supply of services without involving any supply of goods would be treated as supply of ‘pure services’.

For example, supply of man power for cleanliness of roads, public places, architect services, consulting engineer services, advisory services, and
like services provided by business entities not involving any
supply of goods would be treated as supply of pure services.

On the other hand, let us take the example of a governmental
authority awarding the work of maintenance of street lights
in a Municipal area to an agency which involves apart from
maintenance, replacement of defunct lights and other spares.
In this case, the scope of the service involves maintenance
work and supply of goods, which falls under the works contract
services. The exemption is provided to services involves only
supply of services and not for works contract services.